Re: [mqtt-comment] Clarifications to the spec

["andypiperuk@gmail.com" <andypiperuk@gmail.com>]

My understanding is that it is precisely these kinds of clarifications that we have documented that would be included in an initial "TC blessed" form of the spec. Good to know that the committee is (now) aware! :-)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Raphael Cohn <raphael.cohn@stormmq.com> wrote:

Roger,

Thank you very much for sharing these with the TC!

Raph

Raphael Cohn
Chief Architect, stormmq

Co-Chair, OASIS MQTT Standard

Secretary, OASIS AMQP Standard
raphael.cohn@stormmq.com

+44 7590 675 756

UK Office:
Hamblethorpe Farm, Crag Lane, Bradley BD20 9DB, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 845 3712 567

Registered office:
16 Anchor Street, Chelmsford, Essex, CM2 0JY, United Kingdom
StormMQ Limited is Registered in England and Wales under Company Number 07175657
StormMQ.com

On 4 April 2013 11:27, Roger Light <roger@atchoo.org> wrote:

Hi,

The MQTT community has been keeping a list of subjects that need clarification or expanding in the MQTT specification. They are on the mqtt.org wiki at http://mqtt.org/wiki/doku.php/mqtt_protocol under the section "Clarifications".

There are also some points in the "Ideas for future enhancement" section that do involve changes to the spec but that are quite minor:

http://mqtt.org/wiki/doku.php/extended_clientid
http://mqtt.org/wiki/doku.php/bridge_protocol
http://mqtt.org/wiki/doku.php/extended_connack_codes

I would be happy to see the TC consider all of the points.

Regards,

Roger

--
Andy Piper | Farnborough, Hampshire (UK)
blog: http://andypiper.co.uk   |   skype: andypiperuk
twitter: @andypiper  |  images: http://www.flickr.com/photos/andypiper