Re: [mqtt-comment] Minor spellings

["Ken Borgendale" <kwb@us.ibm.com>]

Thank you for this comment. MQTT v5.0 was recently approved as an OASIS Community Specification. We will have another chance to make small changes like this as part of the final standardization step.

I will enter this comment into our issues database so we do not lose track of it.


Ken Borgendale -- kwb@us.ibm.com


Lorenz Haas ---12/28/2017 06:03:10 PM---Hello, while reading

From: Lorenz Haas <lorenz.haas@gmail.com>
To: mqtt-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: 12/28/2017 06:03 PM
Subject: [mqtt-comment] Minor spellings
Sent by: <mqtt-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

Hello,

while reading http://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v5.0/csprd02/mqtt-v5.0-csprd02.pdf I came across two little spelling errors:

Line 430: "MQTT Control Packets that require a Packet Identifier are shown below : ."
-> Dot at the end should be deleted.

Line 1077: "that the Server does not to send a CONNACK at all"
-> Superfluous "to"

Hope that this list is the right channel to report to.

BR
Lorenz