Re: [mqtt-comment] CONNACK property length should be optional

["Ken Borgendale" <kwb@us.ibm.com>]

<mqtt-comment@lists.oasis-open.org> wrote on 12/11/2018 10:05:18 AM:

> From: Tatsuzo Osawa <tatsuzo.osawa@gmail.com>
> To: mqtt-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
> Date: 12/11/2018 10:08 AM
> Subject: [mqtt-comment] CONNACK property length should be optional
> Sent by: <mqtt-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
>
> Thank you for the great work.
>
> I have one comment for COS01.
>
> Regarding 3.2.2.3.1 (CONNACK) Property Length,
> I'd like to add "If the Remaining Length is 2 there is no Property
> Length and the value of 0 is used."
>
> Because, all other messages without payload has similar statement.
> Only CONNACK has not. In addition, treating the property length as
> optional helps interoperability with the former version.
>
> Best regards,
> Tatsuzo Osawa


Thank you for this comment on the MQTTv5.0 COS01. We will gather all comments received during the review period and evaluate them in the MQTT TC. The comments and the committee response will be published at the end of the public review.

Ken Borgendale -- kwb@us.ibm.com