OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

mqtt message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (MQTT-14) Tighten up language in Quality of Service levels and flows

Tighten up language in Quality of Service levels and flows 

                 Key: MQTT-14
                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/MQTT-14
             Project: OASIS Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) TC
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: edits
            Reporter: Rahul Gupta
            Assignee: Rahul Gupta
            Priority: Minor

It was today reported in MQTT google group. https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#inbox/13ec114a841305d9

The spec explains (http://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/dw/webservices/ws-mqtt/mqtt-v3r1.html#qos-flows) that when a message is published to the server with qos 1 the server should persist it, deliver it to all subscribers, delete the message and then puback.

Does this require the server to wait for puback from all subscribers which subscribed with qos1 before sending puback to the original publisher? What about disconnected qos1 subscribers, are they exempted?

My concern is that the pub/puback takes a whole lot longer in this case, without any extra reliability benefits. Couldn't the server send puback as soon as the message is persisted? 

Language in specification needs to be tightened up

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]