[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (MQTT-169) 1.2 Normative and 1.3 Non Normative RFC references incorrect format (11) cases
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/MQTT-169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Coppen updated MQTT-169: -------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 3.1.1 Component/s: edits We should use Patrick's table > 1.2 Normative and 1.3 Non Normative RFC references incorrect format (11) cases > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: MQTT-169 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/MQTT-169 > Project: OASIS Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: edits > Affects Versions: 3.1.1 > Environment: References > Reporter: Patrick Durusau > Priority: Minor > > The references to: > RFC1928 > RFC2119 > RFC3546 > RFC3629 > RFC4511 > RFC5077 > RFC5246 > RFC5280 > RFC6455 > RFC6749 > RFC6960 > are incorrect when compared to the canonical source for RFC citations maintained by the RFC Editor: http://www.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc-ref.txt > This is made more puzzling because there is one correct RFC reference to RFC793, which isn't commonly cited. > In any event, it helps with indexing and searching if the official RFC citations are used as declared by the IETF. > BTW, I maintain a formatted listing of the current RFCs (does not include superseded RFCs) at: http://www.durusau.net/standards/rfc/current/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]