[OASIS Issue Tracker] (MQTT-234) Shared Subscriptions

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=63604#comment-63604 ] 

Nicholas O'Leary commented on MQTT-234:
---------------------------------------

At the Hursley F2F we discussed the relationship of retained messages with shared subs.

The proposal as currently presented says:
 
      Retained messages are sent to the Session that creates the Shared Subscription by being its first subscriber. They are not sent at any other stage during the lifetime of the Shared Subscription, including on subsequent SUBSCRIBE requests from that same Session.

There is concern that this can lead to non-deterministic behaviour as if you have lots of retained messages, when the first client connects they will start to get delivered. When a second client connects, some of the retained messages will then end up with that client instead.

Of those present, there was a slim majority preference to not deliver retained messages to any shared subscriber. Messages published with the retained flag set would get passed 'as live' to the shared subscription as normal.



> Shared Subscriptions
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: MQTT-234
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-234
>             Project: OASIS Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) TC
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 5
>            Reporter: Andrew Banks
>            Assignee: Peter Niblett
>            Priority: Critical
>
> Shared Subscriptions
> --------------------
> Shared subscriptions allow a set of clients to share the consumption of messages
> produced in response to a subscription. The set of subscribers is created by the use
> of a common share name. Shared subscriptions provide a facility similar to point to 
> point messaging in that the processing of messages is not limited to the availability 
> or capacity of a single consumer, the share name is analogous to the queue name in 
> that it names the list of messages to be processed.
> I suggest that a shared subscription be defined by the topic filter syntax:
>   $share:shareName:topicFilter
> - This specialised topic filter takes the place of the normal topic filter in the 
>   subscribe packet. 
> - The "$share:" prefix uses a reserved $ name and will therefore not cause a conflict
>   with other topic filters.
> - shareName is a string which labels the shared subscription and must not contain any 
>   ":" characters.
> - TopicFilter follows the existing topic filter rules.
> - Subscribing clients will be a member of the share only if both the shareName and
>   topicFilter are identical. So, a different shareName with the same topicFiler 
>   will create a different share. Similarly a shareName followed by a different topic
>   filter will create separate share.
> - Servers may decline to support shared subscriptions by not accepting subscribe
>   packets containing topic filters starting with the "$share:" prefix. However, if 
>   they do accept the "$share:" prefix they must follow this definition.
> - The subscribing clients may make both non durable and durable subscriptions by 
>   setting clean session true or false. The shared subscription ceases to exist if    
>   the number of clients subscribed to it reaches zero. If the shared subscription
>   ceases to exist the messages queued for processing are deleted by the server as 
>   with an non shared subscription.
> - A good server implementation will avoid allocating messages to subscribers with 
>   durable subscriptions while the client is disconnected. Instead the messages will be 
>   allocated when a suitable client connects. 
> - A Qos=1 message should be reallocated to another client sharing the same subscription
>   if the network connection to the client is lost before the PUBACK is received.
>   Qos=0 and Qos=2 messages must not be reallocated. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)