[OASIS Issue Tracker] (MQTT-386) Question -Should Topic Alias be included in Terminology?

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=64872#comment-64872 ] 

Ken Borgendale commented on MQTT-386:
-------------------------------------

Why Topic Alias and not all of the other property and field names?  The discussion of Topic Alias seems to be somewhat localized.  I thought the point of terminology is for when a proper name is used which does not have its own definition section. 

> Question -Should Topic Alias be included in Terminology?
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MQTT-386
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-386
>             Project: OASIS Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: edits
>    Affects Versions: 5, wd10
>            Reporter: Brian Raymor
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 5, wd10
>
>
> Would it be helpful for readers to introduce Topic Alias after:
> 387 Topic Name:



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)