OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

mqtt message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (MQTT-510) Improper self reference from Conformance Clause section


     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ken Borgendale updated MQTT-510:
--------------------------------

    Description: 
TAB-1560 - Jacques Durand (TAB)

CClause should not refer to itself (We read in Section 7: "It satisfies the MUST level requirements in the following chapters …. “Chapter 7 – Conformance”) It should not have to. (recursivity is pretty in code but not in COnf clauses!) Additionally there is no need for any “MUST” in a Clause. That is preferable in order to avoid confusion with regular normative statements in the specification body, a conf clause should be worded more like a rule: “if the <conf target> satisfies/follows/fulfill…. Then it can be claimed conforming according to clause ABC”, or “a <target> that satisfies/follows/fulfill…. Can claim conformance as an <MQTT Server/Client”.

  was:
Jacques Durand (TAB)

CClause should not refer to itself (We read in Section 7: "It satisfies the MUST level requirements in the following chapters …. “Chapter 7 – Conformance”) It should not have to. (recursivity is pretty in code but not in COnf clauses!) Additionally there is no need for any “MUST” in a Clause. That is preferable in order to avoid confusion with regular normative statements in the specification body, a conf clause should be worded more like a rule: “if the <conf target> satisfies/follows/fulfill…. Then it can be claimed conforming according to clause ABC”, or “a <target> that satisfies/follows/fulfill…. Can claim conformance as an <MQTT Server/Client”.


> Improper self reference from Conformance Clause section
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MQTT-510
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-510
>             Project: OASIS Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: edits
>    Affects Versions: 5, CSD01
>            Reporter: Ken Borgendale
>            Priority: Minor
>
> TAB-1560 - Jacques Durand (TAB)
> CClause should not refer to itself (We read in Section 7: "It satisfies the MUST level requirements in the following chapters …. “Chapter 7 – Conformance”) It should not have to. (recursivity is pretty in code but not in COnf clauses!) Additionally there is no need for any “MUST” in a Clause. That is preferable in order to avoid confusion with regular normative statements in the specification body, a conf clause should be worded more like a rule: “if the <conf target> satisfies/follows/fulfill…. Then it can be claimed conforming according to clause ABC”, or “a <target> that satisfies/follows/fulfill…. Can claim conformance as an <MQTT Server/Client”.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]