OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

oasis-board-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [oasis-board-comment] Update on what we're doing about the TCAdmin queue


+1

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Aug 26, 2011, at 7:43 PM, ext Michael DeNicola wrote:

> Thank you Chet for this update.
> 
> I like your attitude. Please keep up the good work.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike DeNicola
> Director, Industry Relations
> 
> Fujitsu America, Inc.
> 1250 East Arques Avenue
> Sunnyvale, CA  94085
> 
> Mobile:    (408) 829-9958
> E-mail:    mdenicola@us.fujitsu.com
> Web:       http://us.fujitsu.com/solutions
> 
> This e-mail and any attached files are only for the use of its intended recipient(s). Its contents are confidential and may be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus free. If you have received this e-mail and are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail and destroy all copies of this e-mail and any attachments.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chet Ensign [mailto:chet.ensign@oasis-open.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 5:01 PM
> To: oasis-board-comment@lists.oasis-open.org; Laurent Liscia
> Cc: Paul Knight; Greg Carpenter; Robin Cover; TCA
> Subject: [oasis-board-comment] Update on what we're doing about the TC Admin queue
> 
> Members of the OASIS Board,
> 
> Several questions and ideas have come forward lately for catching up
> on the TC Admin work queue. Thanks very much! With 63 open tickets, I
> want to hear & consider any and all ideas for addressing these things
> faster without compromising on quality or integrity. My goal is to
> have the backlog cleared and under control before the end of September
> so that we are to the point where work on a ticket begins within 5
> days of its entry max.
> 
> Pending more information coming to you soon, here is a brief look at
> the tactical steps we are taking now to achieve that goal:
> 
> - I am triaging the open tickets daily using two criteria:
> 
>   - Can this request be satisfied in an hour or less?
>   - Will this ticket get the TC over an OASIS milestone?
> 
> Under the first are requests for ballots, templates, etc.. Under the
> second are publishing Committee Specifications and Candidate OASIS
> Standards. They typically take less time because all the editing /
> publishing work is finished and they get the TC over the last step of
> an OASIS milestone. I sent an explanation of that to the owners of
> open tickets yesterday.
> 
> - I am bringing on 3 more contractors over the next 2 weeks to
> increase the volume of requests we can process. The first contractor
> starts tomorrow. The next 2 start next week.
> 
> - I am having Committee Specification Drafts and Public Review Drafts
> prepared in tandem rather than sequentially to reduce the time from
> loading a CSD to announcing its review. (We still have to spend the
> same number of hours creating, QC'ing and loading the PR version
> however.)
> 
> - We are, to put it plainly, not trying to fix every single glitch we
> see in a CSD. If something is broken that will reduce the value to the
> reader, such as incorrect links from the cover pages to the various
> resources, we absolutely fix that. However, if we have a draft ready
> to go and we notice minor font hiccups or less than perfect HTML
> rendering, we keep moving forward. (We don't skimp however when we are
> producing Committee Specifications and OASIS Standards. Those must
> stand up to full scrutiny.)
> 
> - I am working with the TAB on two ideas to bring to the Board Process
> Committee: a revision to how we do Public Review Drafts to eliminate
> the additional time spent creating these copies and suggestion for a
> list of detailed, specific, trivial changes that TC's could make
> without triggering a new round of public reviews. I will try to bring
> these forward at the next BPC meeting.
> 
> I am also pulling statistics from JIRA to show how we are performing
> under the current process now and prepare some suggestions on where we
> might be able to scale things back, either through changes to the TC
> Process itself or, even simpler, through reinterpretation of how it is
> implemented in operating rules and procedures.
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions. I just want to give you
> a snap-shot on how we are responding to this crisis. As I wrote to the
> ticket-owners yesterday, this is mission-critical for OASIS and it is
> my sole point of focus until the backlog is back under control.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> /chet
> ----------------
> Chet Ensign
> Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
> OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
> http://www.oasis-open.org
> 
> Primary: +1 973-378-3472
> Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
> 
> Follow OASIS on:
> LinkedIn:    http://linkd.in/OASISopen
> Twitter:        http://twitter.com/OASISopen
> Facebook:  http://facebook.com/oasis.open
> 
> 
> 
> 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]