[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oasis-charter-discuss] Comments on charter for SOA for Telecom TC (SOA-TEL)
On Nov 05, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Durand, Jacques R. wrote: > > 1. The TC apparently is not supposed to produce specifications, but > rather > "analysis, requirements" documents. Is there any reason for > operating in > RAND terms (unless some future rechartering is expected, that will > produce actual specs)? yes. So i'm wondering exactly how it will produce anything but CD's. -jeff > > > > 2. "Develop a requirement document for recommended Web Services (and > REST) extensions to address the Gaps ..." > It seems the requirement doc will go as far as "recommending > extensions" > which means actually hinting at solutions, or at least defining the > directions of future solutions? > Could then the nature of these "extensions" be better defined in the > charter? > E.g. are we talking of > (a) "profiling" or configuring existing SOA stacks for specific TEL > use, or > (b) developing specific WS on top of them, or > (c) "extending" the functionality of these stacks with native > functionality that goes beyond (a) and (b)? > In other words, I see this as part of defining the scope of > activities: what will be the technical > scope of the solutions implied by the requirements down the road? > My concern is: the scope of activity and deliverables should more > explicitly allow for > solutions outlines / directions (if not full fledge specifications > of these solutions), as I guess at some point when > "requirements" meet concrete SOA environments (and concrete specs > like WSDL, BPEL), the separation > between "requiremetns" from "solution outlines / options" is blurred. > > > 3. Audience for this TC: > "The output of this work will have direct benefits for the use of the > Web 2.0 and SOA in Telecom. " > Should this be interpreted that only Telecom professionals are invited > or will benefit? Could there be a line on possible interest from SOA > middleware providers, as this is about requirements for their > products? > > 4. Scope of work: there is 1.a but not 1.b secion. Missing 1.b? -- Jeff Mischkinsky jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com Director, Oracle Fusion Middleware +1(650)506-1975 and Web Services Standards 500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 2OP9 Oracle Redwood Shores, CA 94065
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]