OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

oasis-charter-discuss message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Call for Comment: proposed Charter for Litigant Portal (LP) TC


OASIS Members:

A draft TC charter has been submitted to establish the OASIS Litigant Portal Technical Committee (LP) TC. In accordance with the OASIS TC Process Policy section 2.2: (https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#formation) the proposed charter is hereby submitted for comment. The comment period shall remain open until 23:59 GMT on 28 February 2017.

OASIS maintains a mailing list for the purpose of submitting comments on proposed charters. Any OASIS member may post to this list by sending email to: oasis-charter-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org. All messages will be publicly archived at: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oasis-charter-discuss/. Members who wish to receive emails must join the group by selecting "join group" on the group home page: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/oasis-charter-discuss/. Employees of organizational members do not require primary representative approval to subscribe to the oasis-charter-discuss e-mail.

A telephone conference will be held among the Convener, the OASIS TC Administrator, and those proposers who wish to attend within four days of the close of the comment period. The announcement and call-in information will be noted on the OASIS Charter Discuss Group Calendar.

We encourage member comment and ask that you note the name of the proposed TC (LP TC) in the subject line of your email message.

--- TC Charter ---

Section 1: TC Charter
 
(1)(a) TC Name
 
OASIS Litigant Portal Technical Committee (LP TC)
 
(1)(b) Statement of Purpose
 
Many groups have devoted significant time and effort toward providing assistance of various kinds to litigants without representation. Numerous studies find a sizable unmet civil legal need.  Organization-specific websites and portals publish a vast amount of information intended to help potential litigants overcome the barriers of cost and complexity.  Yet, the need continues to outweigh the solutions by a significant margin.[1]  Strategies to address this gap include, among many technology opportunities, development of statewide legal portals (often referred to as “litigant portals”).
 
The purpose of the LP TC is to develop technical standards for the interfaces of litigant portal modules.  It is unlikely that most organizations will be able to build a complete portal, so it is very important that modules created by different sources be able to interoperate.  That approach potentially solves both scaling, flexibility and cost issues associated with full-scale portals.  Litigant portals themselves offer an integrated solution to several core “access to justice” problems.
 
[1] “Building a Litigant Portal: Business and Technical Requirements,“ Tom Clarke, National Center for State Courts, November 2015,  http://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/accessfair/id/375.
 
(1)(c) Scope
 
The LP TC will produce specifications for data interoperation between Litigant Portal Modules as defined in the aforementioned “Building A Litigant Portal Business and Technical Requirements” report.[1]   Such standards would support development and operation of a litigant portal by:

- defining structured interactions between modules in the portal,
- facilitate navigation between modules in the portal, and
- define interfaces with external partners and resources.
 
These specifications will collectively be referred to as the Litigant Portal Exchange (LPX) Specifications.
 
The LP TC may also produce non-normative content such as tutorials, usage guides, quick start guides and other documents that will assist the broader community in adopting the specifications.
 
The LP TC may establish liaisons with relevant organizations and committees in order to pursue alignment, interoperation with, and adoption of standards produced by the LP TC.  The LPX Specifications shall align, interoperate with, and reuse components from the NIEM [2], the Open Referral Initiative [3], OASIS and other standards, as the LP TC deems appropriate.
 
[2] National Information Exchange Model (NIEM), https://www.niem.gov.
[3] Open Referral Initiative, https://openreferral.org.
 
Out of Scope
 
Functional standards for the portal modules themselves are out of scope.  Most of the supporting data standards are also out of scope, since the project will broadly reuse appropriate existing data standards.
 
Maintenance Mode
 
Once the LP TC has completed work on a specific deliverable (whether “complete” means it has become an OASIS Standard, or simply a Committee Specification is left to the TC’s discretion), the TC will provide maintenance for that deliverable. The purpose of maintenance is to provide minor revisions to previously adopted deliverables to clarify ambiguities, inconsistencies, and obvious errors. Maintenance is not intended to enhance a deliverable or to extend its functionality. In addition to maintenance, the TC may choose to create new versions of specifications that support additional capabilities.
 
(1)(d) Deliverables
 
The LP TC plans to produce specifications for LPX version 1.0 within 12 months of its first meeting. Other contributions to the LP TC will also be considered for incorporation into the specification based on their merits.
 
The LP TC will accept as additional input issues and recommended changes from TC Members and others. Contributions will be accepted for consideration without any prejudice or restrictions and evaluated based on technical merit in so far as they conform to this charter.
 
The work product will consist of specifications for information exchange using XML.
 
Follow-on versions of the specification may be developed to address additional in-scope capabilities identified by the TC on a schedule to be defined by the TC.
 
The TC may produce such other non-standards track deliverables within the scope outlined above, such as tutorials or white papers to support the specification.
 
(1)(e) IPR Mode
 
The TC will operate under the “Non-Assertion” IPR mode as defined in the OASIS Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy (https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/ipr).
 
(1)(f) Audience
 
All stakeholders involved in providing services to self-represented litigants (or potential litigants) are encouraged to participate in the LP TC:
 
- Courts
- State Bar associations
- Providers of legal services
- Providers of dispute resolution services
- Providers of self-help services
- Organizations responsible for creating and/or supporting portals that provide access to self-help services
 
(1)(g) Language
 
The LP TC will use United States (U.S.) English as the language for conducting its operations.
 
Section 2: Additional Information
 
(2)(a) Identification of Similar Work
 
While there have been one-off custom implementations of legal portals, proposers have not identified similar work with goals of establishing standards for such portals.  There are, however, a couple of relatively new projects underway that could result in similar work, but would ideally leverage work of the LP TC for integration/interactions with legal resources.
 
- LSC “legal portals” pilot program (partnered with Microsoft and ProBono.net), http://www.lsc.gov/media-center/press-releases/2016/legal-services-corporation-launches-pilot-program-increase-access-0
 
- IAALS Family Law Portal Project, http://iaals.du.edu/honoring-families/projects/ensuring-access-family-justice-system/cases-without-counsel/toolkit-0
 
These projects will also contribute to effort of the LP TC – see Anticipated Contributions section below.
 
Further, conformance with the National Information Exchange Model (NIEM), https://reference.niem.gov/, is relevant and important to any justice related information sharing initiative.  The LP TC anticipates its specifications will conform to the NIEM for data exchanges and use of data elements identified within the justice domain of NIEM.
 
(2)(b) First TC Meeting
 
The first LP TC Meeting will be an online meeting with the date to be determined after review of this charter.
 
(2)(c) Ongoing Meeting Schedule
 
Online meetings will be held once every month.  Face-to-Face meetings will be held approximately every six months.  Sponsorship for meetings will rotate among the TC members.
 
(2)(d) TC Proposers
 
1) Thomas Clarke, National Center for State Courts (NCSC), tclarke@ncsc.org
 
2) James Harris, National Center for State Courts (NCSC), jharris@ncsc.org
 
3) John Greacen, Greacen Associates, LLC, greacenjmg@earthlink.net
 
4) Riyaz Samnani, Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System (IAALS), riyaz.samnani@du.edu
 
5) Snorri Ogata, Los Angeles County Superior Court, sogata@lacourt.org
 
6) Romulo Reyes, Los Angeles County Superior Court, rreyes@lacourt.org
 
7) Ron Beach, Journal Technologies, rbeach@journaltech.com
 
8) Danny Hemnani, Journal Technologies, dhemnani@journaltech.com
 
9) Brian Schmidt, Journal Technologies, bschmidt@journaltech.com
 
10) John Chatz, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, john.chatz@hpe.com
 
(2)(e) Primary Representatives' Support
 
I, James Harris, jharris@ncsc.org, as the National Center for State Courts’ Primary Representative to OASIS, confirm our support for the OASIS Litigant Portal Technical Committee (LP TC) charter and the participation of our co-proposers named above.
 
I, Snorri Ogata, sogata@lacourt.org, as the Los Angeles County Superior Court Primary Representative to OASIS, confirm our support for the OASIS Litigant Portal Technical Committee (LP TC) charter and the participation of our co-proposers named above.
 
I, Ron Beach, rbeach@journaltech.com, as Journal Technologies’ Primary Representative to OASIS, confirm our support for the OASIS Litigant Portal Technical Committee (LP TC) charter and the participation of our co-proposers named above.
 
I, Steve Wierenga, steve.wierenga@hpe.com, as Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s Primary Representative to OASIS, confirm our support for the OASIS Litigant Portal Technical Committee (LP TC) charter and the participation of our co-proposers named above.
 
I, Rebecca Kourlis, rebecca.kourlis@du.edu, as the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System’s Primary Representative to OASIS, confirm our support for the OASIS Litigant Portal Technical Committee (LP TC) charter and the participation of our co-proposers named above.
 
(2)(f) TC Convener
 
Thomas Clarke, National Center for State Courts, www.ncsc.org, tclarke@ncsc.org
 
(2)(g) OASIS Member Section
 
The Litigant Portal Technical Committee intends to request affiliation with the OASIS LegalXML Member Section (http://www.legalxml.org/).
             
(2)(h) Anticipated Contributions
 
- Building a Litigant Portal, Business and Technical Requirements, http://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/accessfair/id/375, by Tom Clarke, National Center for State Courts
 
- Open Referral Initiative, https://openreferral.org/about/technology-overview/ (the Open Referral Model for data elements used for referrals and service provider descriptions)
 
- LSC “legal portals” pilot program (partnered with Microsoft and ProBono.net), http://www.lsc.gov/media-center/press-releases/2016/legal-services-corporation-launches-pilot-program-increase-access-0
 
(2)(i) FAQ Document
 
None
 
(2)(j) Work Product Titles and Acronyms
 
The primary work product title is “OASIS Litigant Portal Exchange Specifications.”
 
The LP TC’s work product will be referred to as the LPX specifications.

--

/chet 
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration 
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org

Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]