OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

obix message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: Completion of OBIX Version 1.o


Hi Toby,
 
  Here's what you need:
 
The proper designation is:
Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) Version 1.0
 Public Review Draft xx Revision 01
 
 
Once vote for CS passes, then it will designated:
Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) Version 1.0
Committee Specification 01
(date ballot closes)
 
And once OS vote passes, it will be:
Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) Version 1.0
(1 month 2007)
 
All the details can be found here:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/namingGuidelines/metadata.html
 
Regards,
 
Mary


From: Considine, Toby (Facilities Technology Office) [mailto:Toby.Considine@unc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:51 AM
To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
Subject: FW: Completion of OBIX Version 1.o

Well - what do we call them?
 
tc

From: Brian Frank [mailto:bfrank@tridium.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:45 AM
To: Paul Ehrlich; Aaron Hansen
Cc: Considine, Toby (Facilities Technology Office)
Subject: RE: Completion of OBIX Version 1.o

I have not posted the my changes yet, because I’m not sure what to call it.  Am I posting the final 1.0 document or something in-between?

 


From: Paul Ehrlich [mailto:paul@buildingintelligencegroup.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:29 AM
To: Brian Frank; Aaron Hansen
Cc: 'Toby Considine'
Subject: RE: Completion of OBIX Version 1.o

 

OK.  As the TC administrator Mary will need to start the vote.  We need to send her a link to the document and a link to the comment disposition log (see below).  Let me know where to find these and I will forward them to Mary along with directions to start the vote.

 

Thanks;

 

Paul  

 


From: Brian Frank [mailto:bfrank@tridium.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:20 AM
To: Paul Ehrlich; Aaron Hansen
Cc: Toby Considine
Subject: RE: Completion of OBIX Version 1.o

 

The changes are just editorial:

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Change Log for Working Draft 1.0 (27 Sep 06)

---------------------------------------------------------------------

 

- Public review comments  

- Added sentence for vendor specific facets in 4.16

- Tightened up server's responsibility on write failure in 10.1.2

- Added sentence to end of 7.2

- Fix typo in 9.1 example

 


From: Paul Ehrlich [mailto:paul@buildingintelligencegroup.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:18 AM
To: Aaron Hansen; Brian Frank
Cc: Toby Considine
Subject: FW: Completion of OBIX Version 1.o

 

Brian, Aaron:

 

Below are the steps we need to follow with OASIS.  I need the following from the two of you:

 

1)       Are the changes made to the document substantive or editorial?  

2)       If they would be considered substantive then we will need a copy with the changes marked and proceed into a 15 day review.

3)       If they are just editorial then we can place a vote up to release this to a Committee Specification status.

 

Paul

 


From: marypmcrae@gmail.com [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mary McRae
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 8:46 AM
To: Paul Ehrlich; Dee Schur; James Bryce Clark; James Bryce Clark
Subject: Re: Completion of OBIX Version 1.o

 

Hi Paul,

  Congratulations! The next thing the TC needs to decide is whether or not the changes were substantive (meaning that they would cause something built to the public review draft to break or be invalid). If yes, then we do another 15-day public review. The specific changes are marked, and only those changes are subject to comments. Alternatively, if the changes are deemed to be editorial in nature, then the committee can decide that it would like to vote for Committee Specification status. CS ballots must be run by the TC Administrator so all I need is a note from you indicating that the TC decided to move forward with a CS vote and I can start the ballot. As part of that I'd also need the link to the latest spec and a link to the comment disposition log (which should list each comment received, a link to the message, and how it was resolved).

Regards,

Mary

On 10/18/06, Paul Ehrlich <paul@buildingintelligencegroup.com> wrote:

Mary:

 

I need your advice.  We have completed the public review of the obix version 1.o document.  The committee received comments from two reviewers.  We worked with them and have incorporated the changes into the document to their satisfaction.  Please advise on the next step in getting this passed.  

 

Thanks;

 

Paul Ehrlich, PE

President

(651) 204-0105

 

 





--
Mary P McRae
Manager of TC Administration, OASIS
mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
voip: 603.232.9090



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]