[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [obix] Application to have oBIX proceed to becoming an OASIS standard
As well as looking to becoming an OASIS standard, we also need
to begin looking to the future. We know what 1.0 look like, and 1.1 may well be
the “Oops” version (if we knew what Oops was, Brian would have dealt
with it already). There are two tasks that come up as possible areas of discussion.
1)
Many OASIS standards have “Implementation TCs”. An
Implementation TC comes up, among other things, with a guide to using the
standard. An Implementation TC might continue to define what is meant by an
enterprise Often the Implementation TC becomes one of the best sources
for requesting features for the next release. Do we want to create an oBIX
Implementation TC? 2)
What are the next major goals for oBIX? Who should be on the
team? How do we recruit them? When oBIX first started, we talked of an
interface for the enterprise. This is a good vision, but one that we have not
fully achieved. For an enterprise programmer to interact with oBIX, there
is still too much domain-specific (i.e. controls stuff) for the non-engineer to
approach. Each of these areas invite some rather open-ended discussions
this winter. Is there any interest in a face-2-face (or OASIS interop) at the
AHR in January to begin discussing these issues? tc From: Paul Ehrlich
[mailto:paul@buildingintelligencegroup.com] Committee Members: Now that oBIX is an OASIS Committee Standard
our next step is to proceed for vote as an OASIS standard. To do this we
are required to do a submission, have it reviewed by staff, and get votes from
15% of OASIS members. There are a number of requirements involved to get
to this step including passing a public review which we have completed.
The one open issue we have is the completion of two additional
“certifications”. These are statements that you have looked
at the protocol, not that you have used it in a product. Applications are
only accepted until the 15th of the month. We got in for the
December cycle – with the understanding that we would get the remaining
certifications in the next few days. Much thanks to OASIS staff for working with
us on this. The success of this project now rests on committee members
submitting the certifications and on our work to get general OASIS support for
the project. Our application is attached below. On a sad note, we are loosing our
technical committee chair, Aaron Hanson, as he move to a new career. Many
thanks to Aaron for his outstanding work and perseverance over the last three
years. It is the hard work that has been done by Aaron and the other
technical committee members that has gotten us to this point. Paul Ehrlich Co-Chair OASIS oBIX committee As Co-Chair of the oBIX (Open Building
Information Exchange) TC I am submitting the following items to the TC Administrator: a) Links to the approved Committee
Specification in the TC's document repository The approved Committee Specification can be
found at View Document Details: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/obix/document.php?document_id=21461
Download Document: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/obix/download.php/21461/obix-1.0-cs-01.doc
(b) The editable version of all files that
are part of the Committee Specification See links above. (c) Certification by the TC that all schema
and XML instances included in the specification, whether by inclusion or
reference, including fragments of such, are well formed, and that all
expressions are valid The schemas and instances have been
extensively tested. It is available for download at Source
Forge at http://sourceforge.net/projects/obix
(d) A clear English-language summary of the
specification See http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/obix/documents.php
(e) A statement regarding the relationship of
this specification to similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards
developing organizations oBIX version 1.0 is a new
document.. (f) Certification by at least three OASIS
member organizations that they are successfully using the specification The following OASIS member
organizations have certified to me that they are successfully using
oBIX: Tridium Others (TBD) Messages to this effect are
archived at http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/obix/messages.php
(g) The beginning and ending dates of the
public review(s), a pointer to the announcement of the public review(s), and a
pointer to an account of each of the comments/issues raised during the public
review period(s), along with its resolution oBIX version 1.0 went out for public review
on 14 July 2006 and closed on 12 September 2006. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/obix/email/archives/200607/msg00005.html
Comment dispositions: No substantive comments
were received during the review period. Two comments where received and
the changes where editorial only. Links to the change log are in the archived
e-mail link below. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/obix/email/archives/200611/msg00001.html
(h) An account of and results of the voting
to approve the specification as a Committee Specification, including the date
of the ballot and a pointer to the ballot Voting to approve oBIX Version 1.0 as an
OASIS Committee Specification Began 30 November 2006 and ended 6 December
2006. All but one committee member voted to approve the standard.
One did not vote prior to the ballot closing. d The ballot can be found at: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/obix/ballot.php?id=1161
(i) An account of or pointer to votes and
comments received in any earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same
specification, together with the originating TC's response to each comment No prior attempts have been made to
standardize oBIX 1.0. (j) A pointer to the publicly visible
comments archive for the originating TC http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/obix/
(k) A pointer to any minority reports
submitted by one or more Members who did not vote in favor of approving the
Committee Specification, which report may include statements regarding why the
member voted against the specification or that the member believes that
Substantive Changes were made which have not gone through public review; or certification
by the Chair that no minority reports exist No negative votes were received,
and no minority reports were submitted. ====================================================== Paul Ehrlich President, Building Intelligence Group LLC Co-Chair, OASIS oBIX Technical Committee
paul@buildingintelligencegroup.com ====================================================== Paul
Ehrlich, PE President (651)
204-0105 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]