RE: [obix] Obix 1.1 and Interoperation and Conformance

Does this mean the current implementation as per the link is out of conformance, or should be out of conformance….

Indelicate way to answer the question, I know…

"A man should never be ashamed to own that he has been in the wrong, which is but saying ... that he is wiser today than yesterday." -- Jonathan Swift

Toby Considine

Chair, OASIS oBIX TC
Facilities Technology Office
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC

Email: Toby.Considine@ unc.edu
Phone: (919)962-9073

http://www.oasis-open.org

blog: www.NewDaedalus.com

From: Brian Frank [mailto:brian.tridium@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:54 AM
To: Toby.Considine@gmail.com
Cc: obix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [obix] Obix 1.1 and Interoperation and Conformance

In the case of units for history, that is pretty straight forward - either the HistoryRecord or its prototype should specify a unit facet (assuming the system in question has one configured).

Regarding any areas of the spec where things are too fuzzy, I completely agree. Lets make sure we try and get that stuff on the table.

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Toby Considine <Toby.Considine@gmail.com> wrote:

When we started the unfinished 1.1, one of the issues was increasing conformance requirements. DO we think we have gotten all of those?

My mind went to this because of the following link I saw this morning

Display Measuring Unit in History OBIX
I am using OBIX to view a History The return is something as below I am wondering how I could tell the unit is WHr or KWHr Is there any configuration I have ...

This is another simple item to address that we should…

"Energy and persistence conquer all things." -- Benjamin Franklin

Toby Considine
TC9, Inc

Chair, OASIS oBIX Technical Committee
OASIS Technical Advisory Board

Email: Toby.Considine@gmail.com
Phone: (919)619-2104

http://www.oasis-open.org

blog: www.NewDaedalus.com

obix message