[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [obix] Groups - oBIXfigure1UML.png uploaded
One thing I would rather see is these things defined in terms of their oBIX constructs, instead of the xsd types. Maybe this is what 1) is about, but it would
seem more self consistent if, for example, the ‘name’ attribute were an obix:str, instead of an xs:string. Even though obix:str maps to an xs:string, the name is really an obix:str and the fact that the two are the same is sort of a coincidence of the way
we defined obix:str. Is it somehow invalid UML to have it be an obix:str instead of xs:string? I’m not an expert at UML. I can easily embed this into the doc once we agree on whether this is ok. From: obix@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:obix@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Chris Bogen Submitter's message
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]