Comments on Common Encodings, PR01

(1) Simple Editorial Comments

Line 16: Fix formatting of RFC647 format

Line 61-64: Update namespace to meet rules stated on oBIX 1.1, and allow for other namespaces as appropriate (i.e., for the 2015 version)

Line 61-64: Prefix rules invalidate *all* of the examples in 1.1.

78-81 See previous comment

Line 108 Change Full Fididelty to Full Fidelity

Line 462: “Eliminate sentence beginning “Even worse…”

Line 88: Add normative reference to UDP to the references.

(2) XML Headers.

In Core 1.1, Section 8.4 (992-997) appears to be XML encoding rules. If they are meant to be general model rules, please re-write. If they are XML-specific rules, suggest moving to XML section of Common Encodings.

(3) Localization.

Localization rules in REST speciffcation In Core 1.1, Section 8.4 (992-997) appears to be XML encoding rules. If they are meant to be general model rules, please re-write. If they are XML-specific rules, suggest moving to XML section of Common Encodings.

"Energy and persistence conquer all things." -- Benjamin Franklin

Toby Considine
TC9, Inc

OASIS TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar

OASIS TC Editor: EMIX, Energy Interoperation

SGIP Smart Grid Architecture Committee

Email: Toby.Considine@gmail.com
Phone: (919)619-2104

http://www.tcnine.com
blog: http://www.NewDaedalus.com

obix message