RE: assigning issues to non-listed commenters

["Considine, Toby" <Toby.Considine@unc.edu>]

I think it depends.

 

If it is an editorial issue, merely note the change and go on.

 

The assigning back process, to my mind, is to deal with more substantive issues. Do we have some? We can add them to the meeting list and all sign off together.

 

tc

 

---

"When one door closes, another opens; but we often look so long and so regretfully upon the closed door that we do not see the one which has opened for us."

-- Alexander Graham Bell

---

Toby Considine Chair, OASIS oBIX TC Editor, OASIS EMIX, Energy Interoperation Finance & Administration IT University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC

Email: Toby.Considine@ unc.edu Phone: (919)962-9073 http://www.oasis-open.org http://www.NewDaedalus.com

 

 

From: obix@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:obix@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Gemmill, Craig
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 12:19 PM
To: obix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [obix] assigning issues to non-listed commenters

 

I’m wondering what we do when the issue needs to be assigned back to the commenter, per our procedure discussed in last week’s meeting, but the commenter is not listed in the OASIS rolls, so is not available in the “assign to” dropdown.

 

Should we just send them a note?  Or assign it to you, Toby?

 

Thanks