[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (OBIX-26) Section 4, Figure 1, Line 269 & Section 4.1, Line 279 & Section 4.18, Lines 424-550: "Facets" needs better organization and more explanation
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OBIX-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Craig Gemmill updated OBIX-26:
-------------------------------
Proposal: Propose committee discussion on this one, as I am unsure of the commenter's desired clarification. Will comment to list, maybe this can be worked out via email discussion...
> Section 4, Figure 1, Line 269 & Section 4.1, Line 279 & Section 4.18, Lines 424-550: "Facets" needs better organization and more explanation
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OBIX-26
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OBIX-26
> Project: OASIS Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) TC
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: OBIX 1.1 Specification
> Affects Versions: oBIX 1.1 PR01
> Environment: Ludo Bertsch, Horizon Technologies Inc. (250) 592-1488
> Representing CABA (Continental Automated Buildings Association)
> Reporter: Toby Considine
> Assignee: Craig Gemmill
>
> -- "Facets" is described as a set of attributes in the text on line 279, but is not shown on Figure 1. It is suggested that the facet attributes be identified as such in Figure 1 and it is suggested that they be grouped together.
> -- Many of the attributes for facets as described in 4.18.1 through 4.18.11 are identical to those shown in Figure 1 (e.g. display, displayName) for obix::obj but not all (e.g. min, max). It is suggested an explanation or clarification be given why not all attributes are shown.
> -- An explanation should be given or significance of why some attributes are considered "facets" while others are not; e.g. perhaps a clear description of the facet group would be appropriate.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]