[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (OBIX-92) SHOULD statements in conformance clause belong to specification body
SHOULD statements in conformance clause belong to specification body
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: OBIX-92
URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OBIX-92
Project: OASIS Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) TC
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: OBIX 1.1 Specification
Affects Versions: OBIX 1.1 XSD PR02
Environment: TAB Review
Reporter: Toby Considine
Assignee: Toby Considine
SHOULD statements have little meaning in a conformance clause the goal of which is to draw a clear line for conformance.
For example:
"An implementation SHOULD support the XML encoding"
should rather be stated in the specification body, the section of which would then be referred by the conformance clause in a meta-level statement like "An implementation is conforming to the Server profile if it satisfies all mandatory requirements in section 123".
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]