[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (OBIX-164) 1.6 Editing Conventions - examples
1.6 Editing Conventions - examples ---------------------------------- Key: OBIX-164 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OBIX-164 Project: OASIS Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) TC Issue Type: Bug Components: OBIX 1.1 Specification Affects Versions: OBIX 1.1 XSD PR02 Environment: TAB Review Reporter: Toby Considine Assignee: Toby Considine "1.6 Editing Conventions currently reads in part: ***** All sections explicitly noted as examples are informational and SHALL NOT be considered normative. ***** But at 4.2.1.1 bool, I find: ***** An example: <bool val=""true""/> ***** Clearly an example but not excluded from normative text by 1.6. Consider whether examples should be typographically distinct with language in 1.6 saying that all examples are non-normative. I count 19 uses of the phrase ""an example"" where an actual example follows. (Excluding use of ""an example"" in prose.)" -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]