[OASIS Issue Tracker] (OBIX-112) Support for Bindings is optional in specification narrative, but seems always required for Servers.

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OBIX-112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Craig Gemmill  updated OBIX-112:
--------------------------------

    Summary: Support for Bindings is optional in specification narrative, but seems always required for Servers.  (was: Support for Bindings is optional in specification narrative, but seems always requried for Servers.)

> Support for Bindings is optional in specification narrative, but seems always required for Servers.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OBIX-112
>                 URL: https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OBIX-112
>             Project: OASIS Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: OBIX 1.1 Specification
>    Affects Versions: OBIX 1.1 PR02
>         Environment: TAB Review
>            Reporter: Toby Considine
>            Assignee: Craig Gemmill 
>
> "In 5.4.3 Bindings: 
> ""Servers SHOULD include the available bindings supported in the bindings Lobby Object. "" 
> Then the conformance clause says: 
> ""6. The Lobby MUST provide a list of the bindings supported."" 
> Although technically it is OK for a conformance clause to strengthen a normative statement from the specification body, it is unclear why the Bindings section from the start does not make the mandatory requirement itself. There does not seem to be another way to conform for Servers, that needs that optionality."



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)