[OASIS Issue Tracker] (OBIX-222) Inconsistencies in Section 5 contracts vs examples

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OBIX-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=59376#comment-59376 ] 

Craig Gemmill  commented on OBIX-222:
-------------------------------------

This is now consistent as is.  However, discussion on OBIX-223 may warrant changes.  I think we could resolve this, and make any other changes as part of OBIX-223.

> Inconsistencies in Section 5 contracts vs examples
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OBIX-222
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OBIX-222
>             Project: OASIS Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: OBIX 1.1 Specification
>    Affects Versions: OBIX 1.1 WD38, OBIX 1.1 WD39
>            Reporter: Craig Gemmill 
>            Assignee: Craig Gemmill 
>
> •	Section 5 is somewhat inconsistent – the Lobby contract defines bindings as a list of str, but in the examples later in Sections 5.5.2 and 5.5.4 it describes the bindings as a list of uri.
> Brian F made a comment in OBIX-212 about our original plan to use URIs for the encodings.  We've changed those to str, but we need to revisit this section to make sure it is fully self-consistent.
> Note the choice of of the of= value for the lists is somewhat dependent on issue OBIX-223 because, if we restrict ourselves from using complex structures according to the SHOULD rules in 9.3, then we'd have to use refs, or choose a different way to handle versioning.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)