RE: Wrong RFC referenced in etag sections?

["Handl, Ralf" <ralf.handl@sap.com>]

Hi Mark,

 

I’ve created https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ODATA-766 to track this issue.

 

Thanks for finding this!

--Ralf

 

From: odata-comment@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:odata-comment@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Mark Stafford
Sent: Tuesday, 13. January 2015 02:19
To: odata-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [odata-comment] Wrong RFC referenced in etag sections?

 

Hi guys,

 

There are some RFC references to 7230 in some sections of the core spec (e.g., http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.0/errata02/os/complete/part1-protocol/odata-v4.0-errata02-os-part1-protocol-complete.html#_Header_If-Match_1) that seem like they should be referencing 7232. Could you verify and if appropriate file a bug please?

 

Thanks,

Mark