[OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (ODATA-77) Are Edm primitive type names case-insensitive?

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ODATA-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ralf Handl updated ODATA-77:
----------------------------

       Proposal: Treat them case-insensitive in URLs and reserve the "Edm" namespace in all case variants
    Environment: [Proposed]
    Component/s: OData CSDL v1.0
    Description: 
The current ABNF defines the Edm primitive type names case-insensitive, yet all examples use Edm.Binary etc.

As they only appear within null'Xxx', isof() and cast() expressions, case doesn't matter as long as we reserve the "Edm" namespace in all case variants.

  was:
The current ABNF defines the Edm primitive type names case-insensitive, yet all examples use Edm.Binary etc.

What is intended?


> Are Edm primitive type names case-insensitive?
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ODATA-77
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ODATA-77
>             Project: OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: OData ABNF Construction Rules v1.0, OData CSDL v1.0
>    Affects Versions: WD01
>         Environment: [Proposed]
>            Reporter: Ralf Handl
>            Assignee: Michael Pizzo
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: WD01
>
>
> The current ABNF defines the Edm primitive type names case-insensitive, yet all examples use Edm.Binary etc.
> As they only appear within null'Xxx', isof() and cast() expressions, case doesn't matter as long as we reserve the "Edm" namespace in all case variants.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira