OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

odata message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Issue Comment Edited: (ODATA-210) Declare OData object/concept name for tombstone before its usage in Result Maintenance and ATOM format describing sections inside ODQP proposal pages 6 and later


    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ODATA-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=32115#action_32115 ] 

Stefan Drees edited comment on ODATA-210 at 1/24/13 5:51 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks a lot Mike for changing this already (in the upcoming revision) by replacing all tombstones with deleted entries. 
Otherwise we might have opened a can of worms, since in some cultures, tombstones tend to attract additional stones on top, which would have implied the potential need of special structures describing these Collections. Dealing with the loss of an entry is hard enough :-)

Update: I acknowledge the issue as applied in the current revision [OData Delta Query Protocol Design 2013-1-23.docx](https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47996/OData%20Delta%20Query%20Protocol%20Design%202013-1-23.docx) . 


      was (Author: sdrees):
    Thanks a lot Mike for changing this already (in the upcoming revision) by replacing all tombstones with deleted entries. 
Otherwise we might have opened a can of worms, since in some cultures, tombstones tend to attract additional stones on top, which would have implied the potential need of special structures describing these Collections. Dealing with the loss of an entry is hard enough :-)

  
> Declare OData object/concept name for tombstone before its usage in Result Maintenance and ATOM format describing sections inside ODQP proposal pages 6 and later
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ODATA-210
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ODATA-210
>             Project: OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: WD01
>         Environment: [Proposed]
>            Reporter: Stefan Drees
>            Assignee: Michael Pizzo
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: WD01
>
>
> Inside the current revision of the proposal for an OData Delta Query Protocol i.e. [OData Delta Query Protocol Design 2012-12-19.docx](https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47755/OData%20Delta%20Query%20Protocol%20Design%202012-12-19.docx) the term tombstone should IMO better be introduced before its first appearance on page 6 (result maintenance and atom format describing sections).
> I suggest to do this inside the section "Delta Responses" on pages 3 or 4 since it is simply a "deleted-link" with a cooler name, right? ... which is part of the response and not the request. 
> Update:
> Old proposal was to "Define the term tombstone (virtual entity handle for deleted entities) before using it."
> Following the feedback in a comment by Mike it is now proposed to replace instead (as addressed in upcoming revision).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]