OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

odata message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ODATA-342) Can we relax the requirement of int64 numbers being represented as strings in the JSON Format for integer numbers that don't lose precision in ECMAScript when represented as numbers?


    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ODATA-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=33001#action_33001 ] 

Stefan Drees commented on ODATA-342:
------------------------------------

That's good news for me. The size argument was a honeypot ;-) I do not understand scenarios anymore, where JSON is sent uncompressed over the wire  and size is seen as a problem.

When my tools receive JSON over the network, i usally treat all scalar entries as strings to carefully start peeling them off and finally digesting them. 
So there is allways a transcoding layer between my model in javascript/php whatever and the transport containers content. 
Is this direct transfer of typed integers an important part of processing the wild openness inside open data content? (This is a real question, sorry for eventually using funny words).

> Can we relax the requirement of int64 numbers being represented as strings in the JSON Format for integer numbers that don't lose precision in ECMAScript when represented as numbers?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ODATA-342
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ODATA-342
>             Project: OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: OData JSON Format
>         Environment: [Proposed]
>            Reporter: Hubert Heijkers
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The current JSON Format specification requires all Int64 numbers to be represented as strings because of the limitation of numbers in JavaScript were these numbers get stored as 64-bit binary format IEEE values and therefore lose precision past 15 digits. However numbers up to that point could still be represented as numbers.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]