[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ODATA-423) Rename edm:Entity to edm:SingletonEntity and its Type attribute to EntityType
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ODATA-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=33713#action_33713 ] Ralf Handl commented on ODATA-423: ---------------------------------- In a discussion today we wondered why singletons would need a key, and whether "Singleton" would be the better name to also allow complex type instances in the future. > Rename edm:Entity to edm:SingletonEntity and its Type attribute to EntityType > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ODATA-423 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ODATA-423 > Project: OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: OData ATOM Format , OData CSDL, OData JSON Format, OData Protocol , OData URL Conventions > Affects Versions: V4.0_CSD01 > Environment: [Applied] > Reporter: Ralf Handl > Assignee: Martin Zurmuehl > Fix For: V4.0_CSD02 > > > A "named entity" is rather a "singleton entity". > To increase consistency the XML representation of a singleton (formerly: named)I entity should be named edm:SingletonEntity. > To further increase consistency with the edm:EntitySet element itsType attribute should be named EntityType. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]