OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

odata message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (ODATA-538) Metadata-aware clients may prefer odata.type to odata.context (to avoid verbose encoding), but cannot request it


Metadata-aware clients may prefer odata.type to odata.context (to avoid verbose encoding), but cannot request it
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: ODATA-538
                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ODATA-538
             Project: OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) TC
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: OData ATOM Format , OData JSON Format, OData Protocol 
    Affects Versions: V4.0_WD01
            Reporter: Evan Ireland
             Fix For: V4.0_WD01


Suppose a service supports the addressing conventions (so a client would be able to formulate read/edit links from entity set names and key properties), and the client, being meta-data, wants to receive a large set of results (of declared type A, with possible subtype B) that is fairly compactly encoded. By metadata-aware, that means the client has already fetched the meta-data document.

Now the client will still need to receive odata.type for any entities of subtype B, as in the general case this cannot be determined from the returned properties (unless or more of the returned properties can be used as proxy type marker).

The difficulty here is that such a client does not generally need to receive the context URL. And in the general case, odata.context URLs are going to be quite a bit larger than the odata.type, similar to the metadata uri in pre-V4 OData. For example, with this service:

    https://sapes1.sapdevcenter.com/sap/opu/odata/IWFND/RMTSAMPLEFLIGHT/BookingCollection

the metadata uri can chew up nearly one third of the total JSON encoding. The client then must receive and parse a lot of information it does not need (GZIP can help with the network size of bloated context URLs, but they still need to be parsed which can chew up valuable CPU, especially on mobile devices).

There may be cases where a V4 context URI are somewhat more concise than a pre-V4 metadata uri, but odata.context is still generally "bloated" in comparison to odata.type.

And none of the odata.metadata options are suitable to express the client requirements.

(a) odata.metadata=minimal: the odata.type is not required to be present, and the odata.context URLmust be included in the response, even though the client does not need it

(b) odata.metadata=full: the odata.type is present (when needed, e.g. for entities of subtype B) but odata.context URL must be included in the response, along with various links which the client does not need.

(c) odata.metadata=none: the odata.type is not present

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]