[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (ODATA-942) How should headers applied to a batch affect statements within a batch?
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ODATA-942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=63089#comment-63089 ] Mark Biamonte commented on ODATA-942: ------------------------------------- I created the proposal above, but I am concerned about the following paragraph in RFC 2046 Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types.. In particular the part about headers may be discarded by gateways if necessary. The only header fields that have defined meaning for body parts are those the names of which begin with "Content-". All other header fields may be ignored in body parts. Although they should generally be retained if at all possible, they may be discarded by gateways if necessary. Such other fields are permitted to appear in body parts but must not be depended on. "X-" fields may be created for experimental or private purposes, with the recognition that the information they contain may be lost at some gateways. > How should headers applied to a batch affect statements within a batch? > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ODATA-942 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ODATA-942 > Project: OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: OData Protocol > Affects Versions: V4.0_ERRATA03 > Reporter: Michael Pizzo > Assignee: Mark Biamonte > Fix For: V4.01_WD01 > > > Today we don't spell out how setting a header on a batch affects individual statements of the batch, nor do we specify what happens if the same header is specified on the batch and the individual statement with different values. > Do we ignore headers on the batch? Do we define a precedence rule where headers on the batch define defaults, but headers on the individual statements take precedence. For something like include-annotations, does a precedence rule imply that, if an annotation is included in the batch and not specified in the individual request, it is included, if an annotation is excluded in the batch and not specified in the individual request it is excluded, if an annotation is included in the batch and excluded in the individual request it is excluded, and if an annotation is excluded in the batch but included in the request it is included? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]