OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

odf-adoption message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [odf-adoption] A single page to track ODF adoption


We are doing this now at http://opendocument.xml.org/deployments. We track
deployments on four pages (private sector, public sector, NGOs, education), but
if you want this all on one page, I'd be happy to merge them.

Carol



-----Original Message-----
From: Mary McRae [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mary McRae
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:02 PM
To: 'Louis Suarez-Potts'; odf-adoption@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [odf-adoption] A single page to track ODF adoption

Hi everyone,

  Isn't this the purpose of the opendocument focus area? I think this is
exactly the type of information that should be
maintained there ...

Regards,

Mary  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Louis Suarez-Potts [mailto:luispo@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:57 PM
> To: odf-adoption@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [odf-adoption] A single page to track ODF adoption
> 
>   A couple of weeks ago we discussed establishing one page, 
> one primary and central and easily maintained page, for ODF adoption.
> 
> We suggested the ODF Alliance, too, as being a logical place 
> of that; if I recall, Marino wasn't on the call. :-)
> 
> We debated the ODF Adoption wiki 
> (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/odf- adoption/).
> 
> Let's realize this desire. Context: I was just editing the 
> Major Deployments page on the OOo wiki, and went looking for 
> an impartial page listing all ODF deployments. The ODF 
> Alliance has no such page in its Resources bucket. Wikipedia 
> has a rather good one, and I don't mind using it (Alan Clark 
> suggested as much long ago, btw), but would rather use 
> something like the ODF Adoption TC or ODF Alliance. The TC is 
> not perfect for this kind of information, but at least we can do it.
> 
> Or, we can stick with wikipedia, as that is what is being 
> used, anyway, and just maintain it.
> 
> But we do need something reliable and citable.
> 
> best
> louis



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]