odf-adoption message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [odf-adoption] Moving ahead with the ODF Implementation, Interoperabilityand Conformance (IIC) TC
- From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
- To: odf-adoption@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 13:53:33 -0400
"Charles-H. Schulz" <charles-h.schulz@arsaperta.com>
wrote on 05/21/2008 12:54:52 PM:
> >
> > (1) The name of the discussion list, which shall not be the same
as
> > the name of the list in which the TC itself shall operate if
formed.
> >
> > The proposed discussed list name is "odf-iic-formation".
>
> I'd propose "oiic-formation" for more simplicity....
>
OK. That is easier to remember.
> > (2) A preliminary statement of scope for the TC whose formation
the
> > list is intended to discuss.
> >
> > It is the intent of the ODF IIC TC to provide a means for software
> > vendors to create applications which adhere to the ODF specification
> > and are able to interoperate. As such, the purpose of the IIC
TC
> > includes the following:
> > • To publish test suites of ODF for applications
of ODF to check
> > their conformance with the Standard and to confirm their
> > interoperability;
> > • To provide feedback, where necessary, to the
ODF TC on ways in
> > which the standard could improve interoperability;
> > • To produce a set of reference implementation
guidelines;
> > • To define interoperability with related markup
standards by the
> > creation of profiles or technical reports;
> > • To help coordinate OASIS InterOp demos related
to ODF;
>
> The last one would perhaps be up to the ODF Adoption TC to manage.
I'm
> also a bit unsure about the guidelines for a reference
> implementation. Do we actually want such a thing, or do we rather
want
> general implementation guidelines that can be considered as an easy
> "implementor starter pack"?
>
I meant reference guidelines for implementations,
not guidelines for reference implementations. Maybe clearer if we
just leave out the word "reference" and say: "To produce
a set of implementation guidelines"?
As for the InteropDemo, that could be done in conjunction
with the Adoption TC. I think there is natural overlap there.
I copied much of the above from the ebXML IIC TC.
You can see their charter here: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-iic/charter.php
> >
> > The IIC TC may also liaise with other standard bodies whose work
is
> > leveraged in present or future ODF specifications. These include,
> > but are not limited to, the W3C and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34.
> > (3) The names, electronic mail addresses, and OASIS Organizational
> > or Individual Membership affiliations of the three or more Eligible
> > Persons proposing to create the discussion list.
> >
> > Rob Weir, robert_weir@us.ibm.com, IBM
> >
> if I may: Charles-H. Schulz, charles-h.schulz@arsaperta.com , Ars
> Aperta .
>
Thanks!
-Rob
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]