[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] minutes 060427, draft for comment
Hi Dave,
In section 4 regarding tables
change:
RS. We need this for June, also need it implemented for December, so ease of implementation is also a question. Talked of moving away from frame towards direct access.
to:
RS. We need this for June, also need it implemented for December, so ease of implementation is also a question. Talked of moving away from frame towards a more integrated solutoin. It should not appear like an embedded separate document.
RS. The TC needs to address scrolling. Other office documents allow the table to go off the screen withouth scrolling requiring the author to limit the size of the table. This also impact what is exposed to the AT as today's implementations don't expose the entire table through accessibility API to address performance. Access is limited to the visible area.
Also, I had an action item to create an agenda proposal for the face to face. I have submitted this to the group.
The TC has an action item to provide us with a table in presentation proposal by our face to face. This may have been logged at the last meeting but I did not see it. I would like to have this in the record.
Other than these, I am fine.
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
blog: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=441
"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -
I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.", Frost
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
04/28/2006 01:49 AM |
|
OASIS ODF Accessibility SC MeetingAttendees
Apologies
AgendaItem. Roll Call Item. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting Item. Item. 1 Roll Call. Approval of previous minutes.DISCUSSION: RS: Previous Minutes accepted.
2 RS proposalDISCUSSION: RS: NB put proposal to Working Group. After feedback resubmitted updated proposal. Now tailored to their requirements, using svg:title and svg:desc. See list submission for details. It's the same list of elements as before, added comments re transcoding from Microsoft Office. Added a piece about navigation tools to section 4. Added draw:describedBy. Added CA proposed hint text for links, section 6, new attribute svg:title attribute as hint text. When exporting to html, this could be re-used.
Action item: Amend proposal to move away from mouse specific. Perhaps with example using mouse. Who? RSDue date: Next week. Action item: Put forward proposal as suggested on telcon. Who? HTDue date: Next week. 3 Next face to face.DISCUSSION: NB. Attendees
4 Status of tables in presentations - Role attribute required (custom shapes, etc.)?DISCUSSION: RS. Group still working on tables. Could use table API in preference to draw elements or implement a new table interface in presentations, or embed a spreadsheet object. Michael preferred latter option.
5 Role attribute required (custom shapes, etc.)?DISCUSSION: Custom shape can have styling to create any shape. How to describe it. Could use a properties attribute. Need a means of entering data.
6 Future businessDISCUSSION: RS. Can have nested lists, but tool bug is currently preventing it? Suggest remove from agenda. Action item: Describe soft page break issue Who? DPDue date: Next week. Summary of Actions
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Date: 2006-04-27T16:01:16.0Z
Time: 1600Z
Venue: Telcon
Date: 2006-04-27T16:01:36.0Z
Version: 1