Re: [office-accessibility] RE: Mike P Agenda Item SelectionPreferences for May 20-21 F2F meetings

[Peter Korn <Peter.Korn@Sun.COM>]

Hi Mike,

It should be Saturday & Sunday the 20th & 21st.  I don't know why Rich 
indicated Thursday and Friday...


Peter
> First, I have to say that I'm a little confused between the dates and 
> days. My calendar says that 20-21 are Saturday and Sunday. Rich's 
> Agenda indicates Day 1 is Thursday and Day 2 is Friday. I'm betting on 
> Thursday and Friday, since I am able to attend more sessions those 
> days from my office....and my weekend is almost completely booked.
>  
> Day 1 
> 10:45 - 12:30
>     What is left for DAISY support - Dave Pawson
>     Presentation Keyboard Proposal - Chieko Asakawa
> 14:30-15:30 (I'm guessing on the time here)
>     Group Determination as to what will be in ODF 1.1
>     <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/02/xhtml-rdf.html>
> 15:45-17:30
>     Circle Back to Hiro/Chieko Gap Analysis 
>      
> Day 2
>
> 9:00-10:30
>     Formulate Final 1.1 Requirements to TC
>     Resolve Issues
>  
> 10:45-12:00
>     ODF 1.2: Raising the Bar - Presentations
>
> 15:15-17:00
>             Discuss Roadmap/Deliverable for 1.2
>  
> I'll also synch up with the IRC during these sessions.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Mike
>      
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 08, 2006 2:43 PM
> *To:* office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org
> *Subject:* [office-accessibility] Agenda Proposal: face to face
>
> Here is a proposed agenda for the Face to Face for the group to 
> review. I will be traveling starting Tuesday and will not be back in 
> the office until next week so my email access will be limited.
>
> Some important things to take note of:
>
> Chieko and Hiro have a keyboard navigation proposal to present around 
> Z-Order and tabindex
> Dave Pawson needs to let us know what is needed to help DAISY support
> Peter need to ensure we have a table in presentation proposal from the 
> ODF TC by our face to face.
> Nathaniel you need to let us knwo if there is anything left we need to 
> do in terms of formulating requirements to the TC. So far, they seem 
> happy.
>
> Thanks everyone for coming together on the alt text proposal. We 
> covered most of the gaps we had with this proposal and raised the bar 
> with the long description which I believe is badly needed despite the 
> fact that most authors will not do the extra work unless authoring 
> tools force the issue.
>
>
> /(See attached file: ODFAccessibilitySCFacetoFace.html)/
>
>
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
> blog: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=441
>
> "Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -
> I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the 
> difference.", Frost
>