Re: [office-accessibility] Q: Alternative text for drawing objects

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 30/11/06, Malte Timmermann <Malte.Timmermann@sun.com> wrote:
> Mmmh, nobody remembers?
Not clearly Malte.



> I am talking about the recommendation "Alternative text for non-text
> objects", where we recommended to add <svg:title> and <svg:desc>, while
> already having <draw:name>.
I *think* it was repeating using svg:title and svg:desc as is done in
other places.

From 9.1.3

Each element <draw:layer> is defined and referenced by its name that
is contained in the draw:name attribute . Each drawing object inside a
drawing or presentation document can be assigned to a layer. Layers
virtually group the object. Each object that is assigned to a layer
inherits the settings of the layer.

So it seems to be acting as an ID value, not descriptive?

>
> What's the difference between name and title?
>
> Is it because of a draw name must be unique, while title == accessible
> name doesn't have to be unique?


No, different purpose?

HTH


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk