Re: Final tweeks to ODF Accessibility guidelines per our action iteme.

[Peter Korn <Peter.Korn@Sun.COM>]

Hi Rich,

Thanks for catching these.  I was in the process of creating 
"Subcommittee Draft #1" when your e-mail arrived.

You last comment below about Section 4.1.2 applies to two of the three 
footnotes from that section.  Please see the "1 Microsoft Office format 
mapping" in the second column, second row of the table on page 30 (with 
the corresponding printed footnote on page 31), the "2 Microsoft Office 
format mapping is incomplete due to limited alternative text support." 
in col. 2 row 2 on page 33 and the corresponding footnote text at the 
bottom of that page, and the same in col 2 row 4 on page 34.

These look correct to me - that I should not do what you suggest below.

Could you please double-check?  Once I hear back from you, I'll post 
subcommittee draft #1...


Peter

> Peter,
>
> Please make these small changes.
>
> Section 2.3.2 - remove reference to Gnopernicus. It is history.
>
> Section 2.3.4 - delete the extra line breaks (too much white space)
>
> Illustration of the pig - the number 1 is greyed.
>
> Section 4.1 Take the bold off svg:title and svg:description (also 
> believe this is svg:desc)
>
> Section 4.1.2 - on page 33 there is a number 2 next preceding an 
> indented paragraph starting with MS Office. the 2 and indent should 
> go. The next paragraph starts with a 3. Same problem needs to be fixed.
>
>
> Rich
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
>