office-accessibility message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] NY document format study -- Request for PublicComment
- From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
- To: office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:50:58 -0500
Thanks, Peter.
This question comes up in Section Q,
where they deal with miscellaneous criticisms of ODF. Not sure why
they didn't include it among the other Section M accessibility questions.
-Rob
-----
Peter.Korn@Sun.COM wrote on 12/19/2007 06:23:58 PM:
> Hi Rob,
>
> I'm not seeing that question in the PDF. I see a bunch of questions
> relating to accessibility (section "M", questions 39-43).
>
> It is a valid concern - whether existing AT solutions will work with
ODF
> - but it is a concern that has been I believe adequately addressed
with
> both IBM's work in IAccessible2 and support of that via JAWS and
> WindowEyes (and "coming soon" support in OOo), and perhaps
more
> importantly via the Sun ODF Plugin to MS-Office which means that *all*
> AT that supports MS office (and thus .doc/.xls/.ppt/.docx/...) will
> equally well support ODF. Recall that users of MS-Office 2003
will use
> something very much akin to the Sun plugin for reading .docx files
- and
> that is how the majority of AT users will use .docx. Many users
will
> find Office 2007 unfamiliar and uncomfortable, and moving to it will
> require an upgrade in their AT (esp. if it is also an upgrade to Vista).
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter Korn
> Accessibility Architect,
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> >
> > Hi !
> >
> > You may have heard that New York has just recently put out a
Request for
> > Public Comment on "A study concerning electronic record
policy for New
> > York State."
> >
> > The list of questions are at the following URL, and the PDF file
linked
> > from it: http://www.oft.state.ny.us/oftnews/erecords-study.htm
> >
> > One question (#57 in the PDF) refers to a criticism of ODF (no
source
> > given), which is stated as:
> >
> > "Another criticism of ODF has been that many vendors of
assistive
> > technology software have not ported their software to ODF-based
> > applications."
> >
> > The questionnaire then whether this is a valid criticism.
> >
> > Any ideas on this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Rob
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your
TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]