[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office-collab] Thoughts and Comments onextended-change-tracking-proposal
|
By the way, while I look into this, I’d like to solicit input from others on how some of these cases should look. Again, we intended this document to be a starting point of discussion, a catalyst for the subcommittee
to create an inclusive design, not a specification of how I think every detail of a design must look. I’d love to hear from others who have expertise in this area as they likely have some insights I may not. John From: John Haug [mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com]
Hi Ganesh – Yes, as general text edits, we would certainly intend for #1 and #3 to be supported in an extension to the current change tracking model. Same for #2 as a basic table edit. I can start looking at building example markup snippets, though that will take some time given the number of specific cases called out. Until then, some general guidance that might help: While working on the proposal it came out that
each category of change essentially established a basic pattern. So while each of the specific items listed below as example cases would be a separate markup snippet, they follow common patterns and you should be able to get a quick sense of the markup/implementation
complexity by looking at similar examples in the proposal document. John -----Original Message----- Hi, I have had a change to go through the new change-tracking proposal and please find below my initial thoughts and comments. I'm aware of the fact that this specification is intended as a "general vision document" than a full specification, but it would be nice to know the over-all approach that the proposal intends to take to support the below mentioned use-cases
because that would a criteria ( implementation complexity and feasibility to support not-so-simple scenarios ) in comparing multiple approaches. Thanks, Ganesh 1. Missing support for certain types of delete merges. The use-cases that come under this category are - Paragraph merge with a list-item - A list-item merge with paragraph. - List-item merge with another list-item - List merge with another list. These use-cases are illustrated under the category "Other" ( I.1 through I.7) at
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ChangeTrackingUseCases 2. Missing support for table cell splits and merges ( Single as well as multiples and combinations. example:- two consecutive horizontal merges followed by a vertical merge ) These use-cases are illustrated under the category "Tables"
( C.7 through C.10) at
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ChangeTrackingUseCases 3. Clarification needed for multiple and over-lapping change use-cases. It is not entirely clear whether these use-cases are supported or not. Would be great to see this specifically addressed in the proposal. Some examples ( non-exhaustive ) of this category are - A paragraph addition followed by a merge of the paragraph with a preceding paragraph. - Text addition followed by format-change followed by deletion of the text - Paragraph addition followed by style-change followed by deletion of the paragraph. - Text-deletion followed by deletion of the paragraph - Text-addition followed by deletion of the paragraph. - List-item addition followed by a merge with a succeeding paragraph. Some of these use-cases are illustrated under the category "Multiple Changes" (F.1 through F.11) at
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ChangeTrackingUseCases --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]