Re: [office-collab] Comparison generic-ct-proposal and extended-ct-proposal

[Frank Meies <frank.meies@oracle.com>]

Hi John,

thank you for your input, I'll change the document accordingly, see attachment. The most common use case for "delete an element but not its content" is removing a styled span, so you are right, this can be expressed using text:format-change. Another use case for remove-leaving-content is removing a text:section without removing its content. Do we want to handle this as a text:format-change as well?

Regards,

Frank

On 29.03.2011 01:40, John Haug wrote:

91C4760493E4094B9871E5A496374DA2320ED993@DF-M14-02.exchange.corp.microsoft.com" type="cite">

Thanks, Frank – this is a handy start for a side-by-side.

 

I think there is one correction to note, though.  Row 4 indicates the “extended” proposal has no construct to support “delete an element but not its content”.  Or, in a document-centric context, removing a style from a piece of text.  That can be directly extrapolated from the patterns established by the Add a New Style examples, which demonstrate more complex cases.

 

Example document content:

Remove bold à Remove bold

Starting markup:

<text:p>Remove

   <text:span text:style-name="BoldStyle">bold</text:span>

</text:p>

Ending markup:

<text:p>Remove bold</text:p>

Change-tracked markup:

<text:tracked-changes>

   <text:changed-region text:id="1">

       <text:format-change>

          <office:change-info> … </office:change-info>

          <text:span text:style-name="BoldStyle">

       </text:format-change>

   </text:changed-region>

</text:tracked-changes>

<text:p>Remove

   <ct:format-change-start ct:id="1"/>bold

   <ct:format-change-end ct:id="1"/>

</text:p>

Thanks,

John

 

From: Frank Meies [mailto:frank.meies@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 6:13 AM
To: office-collab@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [office-collab] Comparison generic-ct-proposal and extended-ct-proposal

 

Hi all,

while trying to get familiar with the extended-change-tracking-proposal I created a document giving a brief overview of how some of the use cases are handled by the two proposals. If you find this useful, we can upload the file and anyone who feels to do so can add more use cases.

Best regards,

Frank

--

Frank Meies | Software Developer
Phone: +49 49 23646 500
Oracle OFFICE GBU

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Rijnzathe 6, 3454PV De Meern, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven

Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment

--

Frank Meies | Software Developer
Phone: +49 49 23646 500
Oracle OFFICE GBU

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Rijnzathe 6, 3454PV De Meern, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven

Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment

ct_proposal_comparison.odt