[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-collab] Change Tracking and Epochs.
I like this idea. And I'd suggest one additional wrinkle. Perhaps along with document-level revisioning, there is also more granular revisioning at the level of a section, or a presentation slide. This is especially interesting for distributed editing tasks where multiple users are editing the same document. But it isn't clear to me where this information goes: A) Keep the document XML simple, a projection of a single revision, a snapshot if you will. The complexity of the revision history is stored externally, in a database. B) Store the revisions in the XMK, or at least in the ZIP container. Make it self-contained. -Rob monkeyiq <monkeyiq@gmail.com> wrote on 05/16/2011 08:43:37 AM: > > I'm not sure if this would be desired at the spec level or just left up > to implementations to piece together as they wish. But at the spec level > it might be nice to at least be able to explicitly indicate that a > delta:change-transaction element represents a coalesced revision to > avoid confusing applications. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]