Re: [office-collab] Additional use case for change tracking

["C. Boemann" <cbo@boemann.dk>]

On Monday 18 June 2012 16:44:52 Robin LaFontaine wrote:
> Patrick,
> 
>  Thanks for these examples - I think it would help if we all encoded
> exactly the same sample, so here is my suggestion (which is subject to
> your approval that I have interpreted your cases correctly)
> 
>  1st Case
> 
>  1. Original saved by 1st author
>  <text:p>This is the original paragraph, created with change tracking on so
> seen as an added paragraph.</text:p>
> 
>  2. 2nd author changes text:
>  <text:p>This is the second version of the paragraph, created with change
> tracking on so seen as a modifed paragraph.</text:p>
> 
>  Transferred back to 1st author, but that is not a further change.
> 
>  2nd case
> 
>  1. Original
>  <text:p>This is the original paragraph, created with change tracking on so
> seen as an added paragraph.</text:p>
> 
>   2. 1st author changes text:
>  <text:p>This is the original paragraph, created with change tracking on so
> seen as an added paragraph, which is then modified.</text:p>
> 
>  3. 1st author changes text again:
>  <text:p>This is the modified paragraph, created with change tracking on so
> seen as an added paragraph, which is further modified.</text:p>
> 
>  Are these specific examples OK?
> 
>  Robin
Hi

Yes this would serve as a good example where we can easily compare the 
various encodings of change tracking