Re: [office-collab] How do we count? - September 26, 2012

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

Thorsten,

You are of course correct, either proposal (mine or Svante's) would work.

My point is that we already specified an XML model.

If we express change tracking against that model, we need not explicitly 
define another one.

Yes?

Hope you are having a great week!

Patrick


On 09/14/2012 05:07 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Patrick Durusau wrote:
> > What is required is that when I serialize the in memory
> > representation (my meaning of data model), is that it meet all the
> > requirements of the ODF format.
> >
> > That is we specify a serialization of changes against that common
> > serialization so that when we exchange that representation,
> > applications reach a common state of the document with regard to
> > changes. What data model the applications are following isn't
> > relevant at that point.
> >
> > Yes?
> Yes. But I think this is achievable with both your proposals - if
> there's a well-defined bijective mapping between components and xml,
> any import and export code can apply this mapping on the fly.
>
> Cheers,

--
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Former Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)

Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
Twitter: patrickDurusau