[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Clarification on the XPaths File
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings! Given the reaction to my suggestions of XPaths with regard to change tracking, are we all in agreement that the XPath file I posted last week was a simplified version of part 1 of ODF 1.2? That is whatever syntax comes in use for representing changes to an ODF file, it will have to have the same degree of granularity, even if it summarizes repetitive XPath steps into a single token. To that extent, the XPath file I posted should be helpful in determining some of those repetitive paths. Hope everyone is at the start of a great week! Patrick - -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Technical Advisory Board, OASIS (TAB) OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net Homepage: http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWnDyxAAoJEFPGsgi3MgycUucP/AlSJZsODUB1ce+eohi/SFBm oc23/AoCO+iIJpz4byFvyw4C5rrDmBp0+C347bfnYt7dLJZCoyev9dCjO3YoXUyr X3QS6HY9bWwm9r+oB+vGbZRdCh64BZK6Z+qk4K+glUfy2Qh7wlAI7tSlpOv6aF0B GvwUTh1vlCifHIMLRHQVXhILucbAus7omv/B22agV+Srn6LCg1aQQQGVqOHsheqD +0yTCWAY3THIPGX0CSSAIsCL9EFnC/NAsuSv12lggMcG/76/u03QF8c4ftM2DsmV MTva5iXOU8W53+n4tZEKvJFv798jivZ9lbyUJcnnP6W4v8JqEYvGP6BGPfXxzywD EvG1ls9JtSTSrq4nGKUX49d3YBFSmV9ZbJ8Nt0f5HAna5HEkCKwBKMJ6BMSazD/X MqyABdav0gvVohDVxrDe0e5uZWaKMUc9tQBD1H683xZswph6ydxQNuLt7VeulMXH IYdfbkAtjzqgaMeY+JaQJN9Bgs5+aw1PlEqZPx0PSV5aAx7NlN75pAGexVcGJ1T4 hHV8OzO9dmjIQUhDitHBmJzn1U417SsYHRHCwyVKZY+CoJFotXRgh+Bn96K78Yf4 ZfO1WB0MFHhnE1X0StV6S9RadVTquCbO8zUuln0tBdRtqjw0lKbYisZwhFJUdlTF /w2nLZd/2vyW9v8Ko7r9 =v/5K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]