[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: MS Change tracking Question
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings! More a question for Darrin but I wanted to capture it to the collab list as well. Reading part 1 of OOXML/ISO 29500, section 17.7.4.15 and it reads in par t: ***** This element specifies a unique four digit number which shall be used to determine the editing session in which this style definition was last modified. ***** The "val (Long Hexadecimal Number Value)" attribute of that element, immediately following reads in part: ***** Specifies a number value specified as a four digit hexadecimal number), whose contents of this decimal number are interpreted based on the context of the parent XML element. [Example: Consider the following value for an attribute of simple type ST_LongHexNumber: 00BE2C6C. This value is permitted, as it contains four hexadecimal digits, each an encoding of an octet of the actual decimal number value. It can therefore be interpreted as desired in the context of the parent XML element, end example] The possible values for this attribute are defined by the ST_LongHexNumber simple type (§17.18.50). ***** And 17.18.50 reads in part: ***** ST_LongHexNumber (Eight Digit Hexadecimal Value) This simple type specifies a number value specified as a four octet (eight digit) hexadecimal number, whose contents are interpreted based on the context of the parent XML element. ... This simple type's contents have a length of exactly 8 hexadecimal digit(s). ***** Do you see the shift from "four digit hexadecimal number" in 17.7.4.15 (twice) and elsewhere, to "exactly 8 hexadecimal digit(s)" in the reference definition in 17.18.50? I am assuming that what was meant was: "unique four digit number" = four digit decimal number (no more, no less), unique to the document instance, but expressed as a hexadecimal number (always). Yes? I think that is a fair reading and probably how it is implemented but the language about "digits" is ambiguous. I haven't gotten as far as I would like but have done some "lite" reading of parts of the change tracking sections. ;-) Hope you are having a great week! Patrick - -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Technical Advisory Board, OASIS (TAB) OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net Homepage: http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWulQvAAoJEFPGsgi3Mgycsr8QALO3Lgn7oGqrWxhhon57Meol i6O+xxONZFAdqCmB4lvdVlcGj8GeVC4FRvJwoVPu6XngftmySavnJpqa/6fwgxCN 7HcYw9bPPNMlLEewvV+38HWzBOQdh4f/IjxoCyQW/QJ8uSz3unCFRj+MhI3Z4/5W Q2oPPRYVrsWc4Yv/6BeuIzZhDPO/crXqZmI2YVKThyJfRHzBN4M6LdSGdU+QtBl6 JjPU137yOfG7uCqPlKevwHrFunKkWZYQhdpzeFcr8Ci0is25GRUgc8jyUt21RW68 nyJq2t8pEAb4Vu/4zzk4lExV1PSumoZu8/UtfYaXO7rA1wW8QBGrqI4TsahkLkst sbGxFu8W/FT30QDORTimrgsqx15mM4ITZ5PYm1kQQfIWnAKryLhb7u5i3wMVM28z tgZq4avTrZJ+u6yd7rKJap9DCVSDCu86LxioBW4b6srv5WC1/0dW0thLOpq4zOgC RfVjnmh63gRBDyXeOrsr4Kf6Zkouh8ZC1+hEktYhV7FM7rMqoDo7Hkn35adIWf6y RzH/F9sKm1ojd9MIfIAcn9RDY6d+DyHHS4nikkr4XoWj9QpKSZAibdvBUouxKNYq n/efLbWEMUMDQC7R46OFvKs05GKRuXHY5AfII0cN0PMPYr3/w+RYafqPhaGhyCAt VrXwi8EIxf9buDMOKcru =/F3u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]