[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-comment] Comments on ODF 1.0 Errata 01 Committee Draft 02
Michael, > First of all, the paragraph you are referring to here is not subject of > the errata. The errata corrects the last paragraph of section 17.5 only. Agreed as far as my first point is concerned. I will send another e-mail about this to this ML, incorporate it in the second defect report from Japan, and wait for two months. However, I would argue that my other points are very relevant to the subject of this technical corrigenda. First, the correction to 17.5 appears to try to address #70 in the Japanese defect report. > 70. The last para of 17.5 > > All other kinds of IRI references, namely the ones that start with a > protocol (like http:), an authority (i.e., //) or an absolute-path > (i.e., /) do not need any special processing. This especially means that > absolute-paths do not reference files inside the package, but within > the hierarchy the package is contained in, for instance the file system. > IRI references inside a package may leave the package, but once they > have left the package, they never can return into the package or > another one. > > First, an absolute IRI reference begins with a scheme (rather than protocol), > and it does not start with an authority or an absolute-path. This point has not been addressed, since the corrected wording still allows IRI references to start with an absolute-path. I believe that best way to address it is to rely on RFCs 3986 and 3987 wihout trying to normatively summarize what is specified there. Less is more. Therefore, I would argue that my second and third points are very relevant to #70 in N0942. Second, the correction to 15.31.4 appears to try to address #79 in the Japanese defect report. > 79. Attribute names in 15.31.4 "Tick Marks" > > Two attributes (chart:axis-interval-major and > chart:axis-interval-minor) appear in the body text, while four > different attributes, (chart:tick-marks-major-inner, > chart:tick-marks-major-outer, chart:tick-marks-minor-inner, and > chart:tick-marks-minor-outer) appear in the schema. This original comment did question the attribute name "chart:axis-interval-major". I am merely reforumating my original comment, which has not been addressed yet. Cheers, -- MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]