OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [office-comment] Comments on Errata 01 (Committee Draft 03)


Further personal comments on your 1 and 2 below:

MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
> I am revising the JIS ODF draft on the basis of Errata 01 (Committee Draft 03).  
> I have some comments.
> 1) correction to 9.2.19
> I do not understand the following instruction.
> 	Replace “horizontal” with “horizontal”; 
> 	replace “left” with “left”; replace “right” with “right”; 
> 	replace “vertical” with “vertical”.
> 2) correction to 9.3
> I do not understand the following instruction.
> 	The term “scale” should be replaced with “scale”.
If you view the corrections on an ODF editor, you will note that the 
second occurrence of each term is in a defined style. For 9.2.19 and 
"horizonal" for example, the first occurrence is in the default style 
while the second is styled as an attribute value.

That does not show up in the PDF a s style difference (the point of the 
original defect).

I checked the ODF version and while it shows the style difference in the 
style window, I must confess that I don't see a typographic difference 
in the display.

Since the style is defined for the document (otherwise my selecting the 
term would reveal the style) I am at a loss to explain why there is no 
difference in the display, at least in the ODF editor.

I will investigate further.

Hope you are having a great weekend!


Patrick Durusau
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]