[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-comment] ODFF: EOMONTH function
--Y5rl02BVI9TCfPar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi David, On Saturday, 2007-12-29 06:46:49 +0000, David King wrote: > Syntax: EOMONTH( DateParam StartDate ; Number MonthAdd ) > Returns: Number >=20 > If MonthAdd is to be a Number rather than an Integer, then shouldn't=20 > there be test cases showing MonthAdd=3D1.9 for example? Calc at least doe= s=20 > not currently comply - it truncates MonthAdd. Actually my view would=20 > indeed be to define MonthAdd as being truncated to an integer. Done for draft11. That's common application behavior. > Should this function return a Number, rather than a Date? In fact Calc=20 > returns a Number, requiring manual reformatting by the user. Return of Number was already done earlier, it seems. > I hope my various comments on ODFF are seen as helpful - I've no wish to= =20 > impose. I've had no feedback (but of course it's the holdiday season) -= =20 > if mine is a useful and appropriate contribution would someone let me=20 > know? Of course they are useful :-) I think I already mentioned that earlier somewhere else. Eike --=20 OpenOffice.org / StarOffice Calc core developer and i18n transpositionizer. SunSign 0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304 7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS --Y5rl02BVI9TCfPar Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJTn9tZcn5tYf41BIRAuLbAJ0QplWIBRUV1rHdmQe8+XXqKU/0aQCeLRVB vR+/xP974KN6n2WfkBNV7A4= =4/Dn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y5rl02BVI9TCfPar--
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]