[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-comment] Passive voice verb phrases
Alex, Alex Brown wrote: > Paul hi > > >>> I think what the author intended here was "whitespace characters in >>> >> elements DECLARED TO HAVE ONLY element content are ignored". >> >> Laying aside the merits of the comment, this should be rephrased in >> active voice using requirement keywords. >> > > Right, so you'd prefer something like: > > "An ODF processor shall ignore whitespace in elements declared to have only element content" ? > > I agree that is better. > > I wonder, did all the passive voicing derive from the fact that the narrative was originally a commentary spun around the schema? > > I can't say for sure but I do know that removing the schema has forced the text to be more direct in may ways. For example, I encountered only yesterday a reference to "the following attributes." In the original context that made perfect sense since it was followed by a schema fragment. Granted that is incorrect standards prose in my opinion but understandable in its original context. Hope you are at the start of a great week! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]