RE: [office-comment] XML version (Part 3, Draft 11)

["Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>]

Ah - thanks Rob. I wasn't sure if a comment for Part 1 would also count
for Part 3, but looking on JIRA I see that it does here.

BTW, the resolution of this issue looks good!

- Alex.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: 12 October 2009 14:37
> To: office-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [office-comment] XML version (Part 3, Draft 11)
> 
> Alex, You've already submitted this question February 17th, 2009.  You
can
> track its proposed resolution in JIRA as OFFICE-1208.
> 
> -Rob
> 
> "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk> wrote on 10/10/2009 01:03:03
> PM:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The normative reference to XML 1.0 is to the third edition.
> >
> > Why not fourth or fifth?
> >
> 
> 
> --
> This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Open
> Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC.
> 
> In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and to
> minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required before
posting.
> 
> Subscribe: office-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> Unsubscribe: office-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> List help: office-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/
> Feedback License: http://www.oasis-
> open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
> Committee: http://www.oasis-
> open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office