[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-formula] Names/namespace: OpenFormula, calc, etc.
On Sat, 2006-15-07 at 11:02 -0400, David A. Wheeler wrote: > 1. Should we (continue) to call this language "OpenFormula"? I think we should, yes. It's a good name, and one everyone already understands. > 2. Is everyone content with the current proposed prefix and namespace? > The current draft recommends using the “calc:” prefix, and uses the > namespace “urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:calc:1.0“. I think calc is as good as any. It's not fantastic, but I can't think of anything better (you already listed the problems with "formula:"). Maybe "spread" or "of" would be ok too, but does it really matter? > Please complain now, or accept. It can take a long time for external > documents/readers/etc. to adjust to a new name, so I'd rather freeze > the name NOW. The namespace in particular is critical, because readers > won't be able to identify the format without the right name. No complaints. I'm happy with whatever you pick. Cheers, Daniel. -- http://opendocumentfellowship.org "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable man tries to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on unreasonable men." -- George Bernard Shaw
This is a digitally signed message part