office-formula message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-formula] Parameter naming conventions
- From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
- To: office-formula@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:53:03 -0400
In cases where we will be explaining
the function semantics by embedding a MathML equation, it makes sense to
have the formulas in their canonical form, which will mean different things
in different fields. Financial functions will use n, i and p, for
number of periods, interest and principle, while stats will use á
for significance levels.
That's my thought, but I don't have
a _strong_ preference either way.
-Rob
"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>
wrote on 09/05/2006 07:02:51 PM:
> Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> > The problem is that the formulas look really strange using those
long
> > words in them [instead of Greek letters]. Of course it would
work, but...
> >
> These are often the harder problems to resolve, because there's no
right
> or wrong answer.
> It really depends on the audience. All trained mathematicians should
be
> familiar with
> Greek letters, but some of our readers may not have that familiarity.
>
> Anyone have a strong feelings one way or another?
>
> --- David A. Wheeler
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]